In its recent decision R v Tsega, 2019 ONCA 111, at para. 28, the Court of Appeal for Ontario cited Professor Hunt’s paper (co-authored with Micah B. Rankin) “R. v. Bradshaw: The Principled Approach to Hearsay Revisited” (2019) 22:1 Intl. J. Evidence & Proof 68. The unanimous court overturned the trial judge’s decision to admit certain hearsay statements, finding that they lacked sufficient reliability. In doing so, the court relied on Hunt and Rankin’s paper, which argued that the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35, had created a much more onerous standard for the admission of hearsay statements. The full decision can be found here.
Professor Hunt’s paper Cited by the Ontario Court of Appeal
Posted on: October 18, 2019
Recent Posts
- TRU social work and wellness centre initiative expands consent education to India
- Over $130,000 in student support raised
- TRU official partner for World Engineering Day 2026
- Community invited to play SDG Action Bingo this March
- TRU researcher develops AI tool for nursing communication
- Exploring the role of class actions in environmental litigation
- Culinary arts alum leads prestigious school of baking
- Reducing waste, growing resilience: Repair Café returns to TRU
- TRU signs Scarborough Charter, committing to action on anti-Black racism
- Iconic, exotic and ordinary: AWT remembers Matthew Shepard
- BCcampus Award for Excellence in Open Education: Dani Collins
- Honouring cultural identity, diversity through mother tongues
- Budget 2026 backs skills training as TRU delivers for learners and communities
- Award a “fruition of efforts” in final semester
- Alumni Q&A: Why I support TRU Day of Giving
- TRU outlines path to renewed financial strength at budget town hall
- Less waste, better choices: rethinking restaurant menus
- TRU opens new cybersecurity lab for hands-on training in high-demand field
- TRU to sign Scarborough Charter, committing to action on anti-Black racism
- Alumni Q&A: Strengthening communities with care
