In its recent decision R v Tsega, 2019 ONCA 111, at para. 28, the Court of Appeal for Ontario cited Professor Hunt’s paper (co-authored with Micah B. Rankin) “R. v. Bradshaw: The Principled Approach to Hearsay Revisited” (2019) 22:1 Intl. J. Evidence & Proof 68. The unanimous court overturned the trial judge’s decision to admit certain hearsay statements, finding that they lacked sufficient reliability. In doing so, the court relied on Hunt and Rankin’s paper, which argued that the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35, had created a much more onerous standard for the admission of hearsay statements. The full decision can be found here.
Professor Hunt’s paper Cited by the Ontario Court of Appeal
Posted on: October 18, 2019
Recent Posts
- Researchers explore what it means to think like a chemist
- Nisha Puthiyedth breaks new ground at TRU with prestigious national program
- TRU trades enhance training for high-demand mining careers
- TRU secures top spot in sustainability
- FASD Together welcomes families and caregivers
- TRU’s Courtney Mason receives highest honour from the Royal Society of Canada
- Alumni driving Indigenous economic growth
- TRU campus construction setting foundations for a greener future
- Empowering TRU students: scholarships fuel research and success
- TRU supports academic excellence in new BCHL initiative
- Wildfire veterans join TRU to teach next generation of crisis communicators
- Science, technology and Indigenous knowledge combine in summer camp
- Wildfire smoke: insights from a respiratory therapist
- TRU alum leads with purpose
- Mapping local knowledge: TRU students guide fire awareness exhibition
- TRU alum aims to set Guinness World Record with 300-hour cooking marathon
- Donor support helps TRU fill critical need
- TRU’s Jim McCarthy recognized for educational leadership
- Federal grants highlight excellence at TRU
- TRU joins the podium with Columbia, Yale in Circle of Excellence awards