In its recent decision R v Tsega, 2019 ONCA 111, at para. 28, the Court of Appeal for Ontario cited Professor Hunt’s paper (co-authored with Micah B. Rankin) “R. v. Bradshaw: The Principled Approach to Hearsay Revisited” (2019) 22:1 Intl. J. Evidence & Proof 68. The unanimous court overturned the trial judge’s decision to admit certain hearsay statements, finding that they lacked sufficient reliability. In doing so, the court relied on Hunt and Rankin’s paper, which argued that the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35, had created a much more onerous standard for the admission of hearsay statements. The full decision can be found here.
Professor Hunt’s paper Cited by the Ontario Court of Appeal
Posted on: October 18, 2019
Recent Posts
- Inclusive educator joins prestigious national teaching fellowship
- Nursing alum chases dreams to Hawaii
- TRU, BCWS strengthen wildfire management co-operation with France
- New judge in residence offers a wealth of B.C. experience
- TRU and Skeetchestn Indian Band promise to work together
- Law valedictorian known for welcoming new students
- Wawanesa becomes first insurer to fund new research with TRU Wildfire
- Eagle mace takes flight at Williams Lake Commencement
- TRU Law students excell at 2025 moot competitions (part one)
- Graduate Professional Success program gives grads a competitive edge
- Public invited to medical cannabis forum where experts explore addiction therapy
- Endless opportunities with a Comp Sci degree
- PLAR: Bridging experience and education drives student success
- Alumni-founded tech company deployed in California wildfires
- Learning at the edge of your comfort zone
- The future belongs at TRU
- Politicians urge students: positive change means being bold
- Co-op takes stock of wealth management experiences
- TRU at 20: Fostering community connections
- Exploring the role of AI in education, business and society