In its recent decision R v Tsega, 2019 ONCA 111, at para. 28, the Court of Appeal for Ontario cited Professor Hunt’s paper (co-authored with Micah B. Rankin) “R. v. Bradshaw: The Principled Approach to Hearsay Revisited” (2019) 22:1 Intl. J. Evidence & Proof 68. The unanimous court overturned the trial judge’s decision to admit certain hearsay statements, finding that they lacked sufficient reliability. In doing so, the court relied on Hunt and Rankin’s paper, which argued that the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35, had created a much more onerous standard for the admission of hearsay statements. The full decision can be found here.
Professor Hunt’s paper Cited by the Ontario Court of Appeal
Posted on: October 18, 2019
Recent Posts
- Little Lectures brings big ideas back to Kamloops
- Shape Indigenous health research at TRU
- Alum earns place in BC Curling Hall of Fame
- Summer programs create pathways for learners from around the world
- A summer of research: TRU welcomes record Mitacs cohort
- Counting the hidden costs of wildfire
- TRU, NVIT formalize relationship through new agreement
- TRU partners with Canadian Centre for Diversity and Inclusion
- TRU researchers receive inaugural Health Research BC Engage Awards
- Shad students discover new possibilities at TRU
- New baker apprenticeship program rises to early success
- Creating space for Indigenous voices
- TRU researchers awarded nearly $595,000 in SSHRC funding
- Cedar carving brings Secwépemc stories of health and connection to TRU Nursing
- MP Frank Caputo visits TRU for sustainability tour
- Nursing students begin Canoe Journey
- International student overcomes challenges with donor support
- NSERC Discovery Grants support research excellence at TRU
- A familiar face on the path to post-secondary
- Historic gift supports Faculty of Law
