In its recent decision R v Tsega, 2019 ONCA 111, at para. 28, the Court of Appeal for Ontario cited Professor Hunt’s paper (co-authored with Micah B. Rankin) “R. v. Bradshaw: The Principled Approach to Hearsay Revisited” (2019) 22:1 Intl. J. Evidence & Proof 68. The unanimous court overturned the trial judge’s decision to admit certain hearsay statements, finding that they lacked sufficient reliability. In doing so, the court relied on Hunt and Rankin’s paper, which argued that the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35, had created a much more onerous standard for the admission of hearsay statements. The full decision can be found here.
Professor Hunt’s paper Cited by the Ontario Court of Appeal
Posted on: October 18, 2019
Recent Posts
- Helping others feel at home in residence
- Indigenous industry leader brings real-world perspective to TRU’s future lawyers
- Why language matters in conversations about substance use
- Residential school advocates share insights with TRU law students
- Gala raises more than $300,000 to fuel student success
- From self-discovery to next steps: Indigenous students chart new paths
- Human side of wildfire: TRU’s Greg Anderson on resilience and recovery
- Distinguished alumni recognized
- TRU boosts access to plumbing training
- Event highlights TRU faculty leadership in internationalization
- TRU faculty member explores community resilience to wildfire
- Click, explore, celebrate: TRU Gaglardi launches interactive annual report
- TRU activates new rooftop solar arrays to support Low-Carbon District Energy System
- TRU students published in prestigious scientific journal
- Why winter feels heavier for many on campus
- TRU lecture explores how entrepreneurs can think — and act — globally
- Provincial investment strengthens pathway into skilled trades
- Quiet leader conjures magic behind the scenes
- Healing, greening, innovating: TRU research responds to Canada’s big questions
- TRU Law alum Sam Tecle named to BIV’s 2025 Forty Under 40
