In their article, “The Principled Approach to Hearsay Revisited” (2017) 2(1) International Journal of Evidence & Proof 68, Professors Hunt and Rankin examine the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Bradshaw which modified Canada’s principled exception to hearsay. They criticise the court’s new approach to the admissibility of corroborative evidence, arguing that the test is overly strict and is discordant with the common sense, functional approach previously endorsed by the court. They also urge caution about combining procedural and substantive reliability into a third or hybrid approach to threshold reliability.
Chris Hunt and Micah Rankin on hearsay
Posted on: January 18, 2018
Recent Posts
- Communities respond to in-community wildfire training
- TRU social work and wellness centre initiative expands consent education to India
- Over $130,000 in student support raised
- TRU official partner for World Engineering Day 2026
- Community invited to play SDG Action Bingo this March
- TRU researcher develops AI tool for nursing communication
- Exploring the role of class actions in environmental litigation
- Culinary arts alum leads prestigious school of baking
- Reducing waste, growing resilience: Repair Café returns to TRU
- TRU signs Scarborough Charter, committing to action on anti-Black racism
- Iconic, exotic and ordinary: AWT remembers Matthew Shepard
- BCcampus Award for Excellence in Open Education: Dani Collins
- Honouring cultural identity, diversity through mother tongues
- Budget 2026 backs skills training as TRU delivers for learners and communities
- Award a “fruition of efforts” in final semester
- Alumni Q&A: Why I support TRU Day of Giving
- TRU outlines path to renewed financial strength at budget town hall
- Less waste, better choices: rethinking restaurant menus
- TRU opens new cybersecurity lab for hands-on training in high-demand field
- TRU to sign Scarborough Charter, committing to action on anti-Black racism
