In their article, “The Principled Approach to Hearsay Revisited” (2017) 2(1) International Journal of Evidence & Proof 68, Professors Hunt and Rankin examine the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Bradshaw which modified Canada’s principled exception to hearsay. They criticise the court’s new approach to the admissibility of corroborative evidence, arguing that the test is overly strict and is discordant with the common sense, functional approach previously endorsed by the court. They also urge caution about combining procedural and substantive reliability into a third or hybrid approach to threshold reliability.
Chris Hunt and Micah Rankin on hearsay
Posted on: January 18, 2018
Recent Posts
- TRU supports academic excellence in new BCHL initiative
- Wildfire veterans join TRU to teach next generation of crisis communicators
- Science, technology and Indigenous knowledge combine in summer camp
- Wildfire smoke: insights from a respiratory therapist
- TRU alum leads with purpose
- Mapping local knowledge: TRU students guide fire awareness exhibition
- TRU alum aims to set Guinness World Record with 300-hour cooking marathon
- Donor support helps TRU fill critical need
- TRU’s Jim McCarthy recognized for educational leadership
- Federal grants highlight excellence at TRU
- TRU joins the podium with Columbia, Yale in Circle of Excellence awards
- TRU students use AI to monitor salmon in Skeetchestn territory
- MEd pilot connects international teachers to B.C. classrooms
- Alum scores accolade for WolfPack coverage
- TRU celebrates $50M sustainability milestone with Low-Carbon District Energy System
- Dr. Airini formally installed as TRU’s fifth president and vice-chancellor
- Connect with the TRU Alumni Network
- Baihua Chadwick honoured with lifetime achievement award in international education
- Outstanding chemistry educator lauded with national award
- Cliff Robinson receives 2025 Chair Leadership Award